Exhibit
A-Z An Historical Survey Of Women Artists
The theme of the exhibit is portraying the way women artists
painted by recreating their style with a pear as the main focus. Each oil painting
shows a pair, but they each are very different.
Gallery
The lighting in the gallery was very subtle. The lights were small and mainly
shown upon the works. It was spotty.
The walls were a light beige, almost white, color, or a dark grey, almost black,
color.
There is not much in the interior. In one space there were some fake trees on
the wall and a quote stickered to the wall as well.
The movement was smooth. Part of the gallery is similar to a
school without walls. The whole gallery is less ‘spacious’ and more made up of
paths for the viewer to choose which one to go down.
Artwork
The artworks were mainly organized by what exhibit they were
a part of. Mostly paintings were together and sculptures were together.
Although, there were spaces where both were intertwined.
I found that the art work in a specific exhibit was obviously very similar in
style and structure, but all of the other artwork seemed very different for me.
Some pieces were bright and colorful and very detailed. Others were plain, but
still were able to stand out just as much. Each piece had such a different feel
to it. I had never been to Burchfield Penney before so it was a very new
experience that I very much enjoyed.
The pieces were framed in all different ways. Some had very thin frames, some
were not framed at all, and some had such thick frames that they almost
amounted to be bigger than the work.
Each artwork had a square on the wall next to it telling of
the artist, title, year made, medium, and what collection it was from. For some
of the sculptures the squares were on the platform of the work.
Most pieces had room enough for two people to stand
between the artworks. Other works, as in the pear exhibit I mentioned above,
were more tightly arranged.
Art Criticism Exercise
Jackie Pancari, Reflective Translation
(red letter), A letter from sol
Lewitt to Eva Hesse, 2015, Mirrored plate glass, reflective material
The artwork was very unique. I had never seen anything like
it. It had the simplicity of lipstick writing on a mirror, but the complexity
of a sonnet. There were six mirrors hanging from strings attached to a board
that was attached to the wall. Each piece of reflective material had many words
written on it. The words were all written in a shade of pinkish red, and all of
the words were displayed in different ways. For example, the words in one of
the pieces look to be in the shape of an eye or perhaps a finger print. Pattern
is something that really made each piece of mirror stand apart from each other.
They were all written in merely the same color, and each piece is the same
size. The patterns of the ways in which the words are written are what make
each one so different. This piece reminds me of something that was once done at
my church. There were mirrors set up, and each youth had to come up and write
something that was troubling them on the mirror. It was a surreal experience
because as I was writing, I was looking at my own reflection. It made it feel
much more personal. The artists’ note that was on the wall next to the piece
says that the artist asked other artists to re write a letter written in 1965
in their own words. I feel as though the artist put these writings onto
reflective material so that while the viewers were reading it, they could see
themselves in the piece and connect it to their own lives.


Namdoo Kim, White City,
2015, Casted Glass, wood and mixed media
This piece immediately caught my attention because of its
familiarity; Monopoly. As I stepped closer, I realized that in the open door of
the structure was a baby that appeared to be plastic but could have been glass.
It was curled up and would light up indigo, and then go dark again. The
complete rest of the sculpture was just white and the same material. The
structure was very plain, having little design etched into it. Color and light
definitely emphasizes the baby within the structure. The contrast from the rest
of the structure to the baby is strong. The infant is meant to stand out to the
viewer, as well as the monopoly man’s head. That familiarity was also used for
emphasis. The bottom part of the structure is symmetrical, as is the top part,
but the middle part stands alone, being asymmetrical. This piece does not
remind me of anything; it was very hard for me to understand. The baby having
such little space could symbolize something such as a panic room, or lack of
space due to a situation like poverty. Monopoly is a game all about money, and
his head is enlarged and on top of the structure, perhaps making a statement
about where wealth lies in the world. With the door being open beneath the
head, it gives the impression that there is escape for the little one. That
perhaps it is possible to get out and make a change.


Edith Lunt Small, The
Entry of Christ Into Manhattan, 1982, acrylic on board
This is a painting of Manhattan, with many well-known people
walking about throughout the streets. The top is spacious, showing the
skyscrapers and a touch of sky, whereas down below people are everywhere. There
are beams of light coming down from the sky, and they are surrounding Jesus, as
it appears he is coming into the city. Color is heavily used. There are many
different colors. This helps to show how many people are about, but also how
different they are all. Space is a big factor. All of these people wearing
different colored clothing are all so close in proximity, showing how little
space there is for them to be and how busy the city is. There are a few
miniature Santas that I spotted throughout the painting. I feel as though these
symbolize how many people view Jesus. Also, they symbolize what people think
they are celebrating on Christmas. The birth of Jesus has been replaced by a
fat gift giving hero in a red suit. With all of the people gathered, they could
possibly be there to see Jesus’ arrival. However, none of them are looking at
Him. Although it appears that Christ is in the city, it also appears that he is
not. His physical presence, but maybe not his spiritual presence. He is so
little in the scheme of the whole painting, maybe reflecting how little the
artist feels his importance is in many people’s lives.
I thought it was a nice experience. I felt like I had a
purpose being there. I have always just walked aimlessly around art galleries
not sure what I was looking for, and as for the Louvre, being overwhelmed by
its size. It was interesting to see how the gallery was set up and to think
about how this makes the visitors feels. It was also neat capturing some bird’s
eye views of the gallery from the second floor.